Реклама Google — средство выживания форумов :)
Ксана Бланк сравнивает супрематизм Малевича с творчеством Льва Толстого. В частности, в рассказе Толстого «Записки сумасшедшего» описывается комната, где Фёдор начинает испытывать смертельную тоску: «Чисто выбеленная квадратная комнатка. Как, я помню, мучительно мне было, что комнатка эта была именно квадратная. Окно было одно, с гардинкой — красной». То есть, красный квадрат на белом фоне является, по сути, символом тоски. Сам Малевич пояснял концепцию своего первого «Чёрного квадрата», что «квадрат — чувство, белое пространство — пустота за этим чувством». Ксана Бланк приходит к выводу, что, как и в рассказе Толстого, красный квадрат на белом фоне графически изображает страх смерти и пустоты.
If Russia declared war on the US, you DO realize the US is stationed all over the world. Geopolitically, we cover the world from every angle. We would destroy Russia before they have a chance to do anything about it. We surround Russia.
Russia is our doll.
Schmuck,can shove up your ass these videos!It means nothing,you stupid guy,I have the same led,you lying skank!
Which explains why Russia is so desperate, they have to make friends with North Korea.
By the way, those labeled in black are the markets of the world. Without us, the world has nothing. We're ALL of China's revenue.
Friends and allies: Ukraine, the US, Western European democracies, Eastern European democracies, Canada, Japan, Australia...
Friends and allies: one-party totalitarian mafia-run Russia, Communist North Korea, Communist China, Iran run by medieval mullahs, Assad, the butcher of Damascus, the dictator of Belarus...
I will say one thing, why the (*)(*)(*)(*) would I or anyone with a brain give a (*)(*)(*)(*) if a bunch of brainwashed Russian students want to suck putins dick like the rest of you simpleminded slaves?
No. They shouldn't. They were right to vote against it. 2 reasons for Canada and the U.S. That I can think of right off the bat. First off, the resolution would have been an assault on freedom of speech and assembly, something Russia desperately wants to control. I may not like it, you may not like it, but people have the right to believe in what they want to believe in, so long as those beliefs don't bring harm to others. If someone wants to be a neo nazi and hold nazi pride rally, then all we can do is bite our tongues and make sure they don't do anything stupid, but they have the right to do so as human beings. Now if they start trying to harm or cause problems for people they see as inferior to them, that's when we need to step in and (*)(*)(*)(*) them up. But simply attacking them for thier personal belifes is wrong. That is one reason Canada and the U.S. Voted against it.
The second reason for Canada was that ever since that assembly back in 2001 Canada has been very distrusting of such assembly's. Russia is far from the first batik to purpose such a resolution and it won't be the last. But back in 2001 there was s pretty big one but unfortunately a lot of Arab nations used the assembly as an excuse to horrendously berate and attack Israel. Every few years another one of these resolutions and assembly's are tried and every time different nations try and sneak thier personal agenda into them and so Canada is pretty much like "screw this bullcrap" at this point.
A second reason for the U.S. (And also Canada actually) was that the U.S. Could see right through Moscow bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and saw what this resolution really was about. Ukraine. From the beginning Moscow has accused Ukraine of being a "fascist state" that is run by neo nazis and blah blah blah. Your familiar with all this. You say the same bull(*)(*)(*)(*) every day here. Russia even stated thier fears of "nazis" as a primary excuse for its illegal annexation of Crimea. The U.S. Easily saw that this conveniently timed resolution was just a farce to give Russia a legal excuse to commit more crimes in eastern or even western Ukraine. Had the resolution passed Russia would have immediately used it as an excuse to most likely just full on invade all of Ukraine under the guise of "stopping nazis" and they would have legally been allowed to do so. If not invade then they would do something like use it as an excuse to put Russian "peacekeepers" (aka occupation forces) in eastern Ukraine, which would prevent Ukraine from ever being able to reclaim its stolen land from Russia or even respond to attaches from the Russian terrorist. This is exactly the scenario that would happen. Russian terrorists or "self defense forces" would fire artillery on a Kiev held city or something. Kiev would then have no choice but to return fire to stop the terrorists from bombing them. Russia would then make the claim that X number of its Russian peacekeepers were killed when Kiev returned fire and use it as an excuse to declare war on Ukraine.