Информационная война

Видео, на котором слышно, как женский голос по-английски выкрикивает: «я не хочу слушать человека, который убивает детей». Это подхватывают другие слушатели и одобрительно хлопают в поддержку студентки.

 

пастор баптистской церкви - Dr. Charles Stanley. является старшим пастором Первой Баптистской церкви города Атланта

 

The western Ukrainians, who fought for Hitler during World War II, maintained an impressive lobby organization in Washington and secured their independent country, but they did not control Ukraine because much of the country consists of former Russian territories made part of Ukraine by Soviet leaders in the 20th century.
Keeping Ukraine out of NATO is no doubt a goal of the Russian government. However, the trouble that Washington brought to Russia in Ukraine–by orchestrating a coup, installing a puppet government, and unleashing violence against the residents of the former Russian territories that Soviet leaders attached to Ukraine–is being used for wider purposes than to incorporate Ukraine within NATO.
In other words, Washington’s strategic goals go beyond NATO membership for Ukraine.

 

Russians consider Ukraine as being part of the Greater Russia. That was historically so – not by the conquest.

Just after the declaration of the new state – the modern Ukraine in 1991 – the question of pan-Ukrainian identity arose.

Such a State and nation never existed in history. So the nation had to be constructed. But the three main identities were very different. Crimea populated by Greater Russians along with most parts of Novorossia which were clearly attracted to the Russian Federation. The Western Russians claimed to be the core of a very specific “Ukrainian nation” that they imagined in order to serve their cause. The Western Russians who partly supported Hitler in WWII (Bandera, Shukhevich) possessed and still possess strong ethnic identity where the hatred toward Great Russians (as well as toward Poles to a lesser scale) plays a central role in this identity.